Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 SW2D 150 - Gragg v. Hill

Gragg v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1989

13 state decisions

40193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harkness v. Hutcherson · Bevers v. Winfrey · Donna Independent School Dist. v. First State Bank of Donna · State ex rel. Marrs v. Abshier · Brazoria Independent School Dist. v. Weems

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Proceedings before boards of this kind are more or less informal and it is not necessary that the minutes of their proceedings contain all of the essential elements of a judgment in a court of law. It is only necessary that such minutes be sufficiently clear to disclose the intention of the board.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.