Harris v. Goodloe’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1984
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Olcott v. Gabert · De La Vega v. League · Green v. Churchwell · Jackson v. Pure Oil Operating Co. · Holman v. Criswell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In an action for partition alone title is assumed. ‘Title to land not ordinarily being an issue in proceedings, for partition thereof, the presumption is not that title is an issue hut that title is not an issue.’ 47 C.J. 421, § 384. In fact a partition, even in kind, does not accomplish any transfer of, or change in, title.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burkitt v. Broyles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.