Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 SW2D 536 - Powell v. Rockow

Powell v. Rockow’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 1946
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Isbell v. Lennox · Wisdom v. Peek · Patrick v. Roach · Gray v. Allen · Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Keith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Different elements * * * were pleaded by appellees conjunctively as constituting the fraud upon which they sought rescission. As pleaded by them, the fraud consisted of the making of all the representations; that, conjunctively, the representations were false and, as pleaded, they were submitted to the jury. It thus appears that the several elements of this question were pleaded as constituting one issue and, therefore, it was not error to submit them conjunctively, as was done. Therefore, the form of the question was not reversible error. Ft. Worth R. G. Railway Co. v. Keith (Tex.Com.App.) 208 S.W. 891 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.