Reasonover v. Reasonover’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2018
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris County v. Stewart · Lytle v. Halff · E. L. Wilson Hardware Co. v. Duff · St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Hall · 85 Tex. Crim. 326 - Cockrell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conform the jurisdiction of the district and other inferior courts thereto.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Landry · Dailing v. State““The amendment to section 1, article 5 adopted in 1891, does not purport to take away from the district court, or to authorize the Legislature to take away from it, its constitutional jurisdiction. It does authorize the Legislature to take from it the exclusive nature of its jurisdiction over the subjects mentioned in section 8, article 5, and permits the Legislature to give jurisdiction over them also to other courts. The Legislature cannot take away from a district court jurisdiction given it by the Constitution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dugar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.