Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 SW3D 694 - State v. Burkhart

State v. Burkhart’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Parker v. Levy · Grayned v. City of Rockford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statute is not vague which by orderly processes of litigation can be rendered sufficiently definite and certain for purposes of judicial decision. Courts should consider any limiting instructions of the challenged statute that state authorities have proffered. In fact, it is the duty of the courts to adopt a construction which will sustain a statute and avoid constitutional conflict if its recitation permits such a construction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.