Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 TC 32 - Seay v. Commissioner

Seay v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Burke (1992), Robinson v. Commissioner (1994)

3 federal appellate ·

26019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. · Gideon v. Cochran · Knuckles v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Penn v. Rinaldi · Sanders v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The term 'damages received (whether by suit or agreement)' means an amount received (other than workmen's compensation) through prosecution of a legal suit or action based upon tort or tort-type rights, or through a settlement agreement entered into in lieu of such prosecution”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the determination of whether a settlement payment is exempt from taxation depends on the nature of the claim settled and not on the validity of the claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “personal embarrassment, mental and physical strain and injury to health and personal reputation in the community”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.