Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

58 Tex. Crim. 511

127 S.W 815

Phelps v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1910

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1910-03-16

<p>local Option—Felony—Statutes Construed.</p> <p>The felony provision, of the Act of the Thirty-first Legislature, has no application to the sale of intoxicating liquors in counties which had adopted local option before the passage of said Act. Following Lewis v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 351.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1938

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1910-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

RAMSEY, Judge.

¶1 Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Hill County on the 14th day of December, 1909, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of one year.

¶2 There are a number of questions raised both by motion for new trial and bills of exception, which we deem unnecessary to set out. The holding of the court in the case of Lewis v. State, decided at the present term, to the effect, in substance, that the felony provision of the statute of the last Legislature has no application to sales in counties which had adopted local option before the passage of the Act in question, must dispose of the appeal adversely to the State.

¶3 For the reasons given in the Lewis case, the judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions to the District Court to transfer the case to the County Court of Hill County.

¶4 Reversed and remanded.

/58/texcrim/511 · .json · Public domain