Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 U.S. 170 - The Schooner Catharine v. Noah Dickinson

The Schooner Catharine v. Noah Dickinson’s Empirical Analysis

58 U.S. 170 · 1854

Citation profile

200
cited by 200 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

85 federal appellate · 30 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 200 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2008 · most notably United States v. Reliable Transfer Co. (1975), Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique (1979)

85 federal appellate · 30 district · 4 state decisions

3301854186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decidedoverruled

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. A case is still cited after being overruled — to note the reversal, distinguish it, or in dissent. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Barrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 200 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [I]t becomes necessary to settle the rule of damages in a case where both vessels are in fault. 170 The question, we believe, has never until now come distinctly before this court for decision. The rule that prevails in the District and Circuit Courts, we understand, has been to divide the loss.... 171 This seems to be the well-settled rule in the English admiralty.... 172 Under the circumstances usually attending these disasters, we think the rule deviding [sic] the loss the most just and equitable, and as best tending to induce care and vigilance on both sides in the navigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““However this may be in the daytime, we think that such custom or usage cannot be permitted as an excuse for dispensing with a proper lookout while navigating in the night, especially on waters frequented by oilier vessels. Under such circumstances, a competent lookout, stationed upon a quarter of the vessel affording the best opportunity to see at a distance those meeting her, is indispensable to safe navigation, and the neglect is chargeable as a fault in the navigation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.