Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 U.S. 344 - Burchell v. Marsh

Burchell v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

58 U.S. 344 · 1854

Citation profile

336
cited by 336 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
24
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

92 federal appellate · 15 district · 125 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 336 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. (1960), Wilko v. Swan (1953)

92 federal appellate · 15 district · 125 state decisions — followed in 24 states

620185418601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 336 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Arbitrators are judges chosen by the parties to decide the matters submitted to them, finally and without appeal. As a mode of settling disputes, it should receive every encouragement from courts of equity. If the award is within the submission, and contains the honest decision of the arbitrators, after a full and fair hearing of the parties, a court of equity will not set it aside for error, either in law or fact. A contrary course would be a substitution of the judgment of the chancellor in place of the judges chosen by the parties, and would make an award the commencement, not the end, of litigation.”
    47 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If they (the arbitrators) have given their honest incorrupt judgment on the subject-matters submitted to them, after a full and fair hearing of the parties, they are bound by it.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the parties have agreed to trust the discretion and judgment of their neighbors acquainted with them, and their relative standing and credit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.