Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 Wash. App. 112 - State v. Entz

58 Wash. App. 112 - State v. Entz’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Oyler v. Boles · 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall · 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · Bordenkircher v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he exercise of a prosecutor's discretion by charging some but not others guilty of the same crime does not violate the equal protection clause of U.S. Const, amend. 14 or Const, art. 1, § 12 so long as the selection was not "deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.