State v. Allert’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · Bourns, Inc. v. Allen-Bradley Co. · 108 Wash. 2d 419 - State v. Fisher · 98 Wash. 2d 789 - State v. Crenshaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A: I think [the defendant] was impaired in terms of his judgment and thinking and ability to reason out what was happening or what he was doing at that time. Q: He could recognize that what he was doing was wrong but he was doing it for a number of reasons, whether those be good reasons or bad reasons? A: I am not sure he was able to determine that.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Where the decision or order of the trial court is a matter of discretion, it will not be disturbed on review except on a clear showing of abuse of discretion, that is, discretion manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he defendant's capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct ... was significantly impaired (voluntary use of drugs or alcohol is excluded).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.