State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 41 Wash. App. 669 - State v. Hartley · 52 Wash. App. 796 - State v. Chavez · 50 Wash. App. 578 - State v. Harper · 51 Wash. App. 442 - State v. Hartley · 49 Wash. App. 239 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(6) In the case of multiple prior convictions, for the purpose of computing the offender score, count all convictions separately, except: (c) In the case of multiple prior convictions for offenses committed before July 1, 1986, for the purpose of computing the offender score, count all adult convictions served concurrently as one offense . . . Use the conviction for the offense that yields the highest offender score.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we believe the Legislature intended the sentences must begin and end at the same time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.