58 Wash. App. 740 - State v. Sly’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach · 55 Wash. App. 738 - State v. Brown · 104 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Holt · 54 Wash. App. 408 - State v. Strauss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`of the opportunity to make a proper record to sustain its observation.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]t is not necessary to use the exact words of the statute if other words are used which equivalently or more extensively signify the words in the statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[I]t is not necessary to use the exact words of the statute if other words are used which equivalently or more extensively signify the words in the statute." The Leach court expressly rejected the suggestion in Holt , that the "essential elements" rule requires a charging document to list every statutory element of the crime charged. It is not necessary to " list every element of a crime. Rather, the charging document must allege sufficient facts to support every element of the crime charged."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.