58 Wash. App. 83 - State v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · Texas v. Certain Named & Unnamed Undocumented Alien Children · 98 Wash. 2d 358 - State v. Saltarelli · 101 Wash. 2d 745 - State v. Laureano · 40 Wash. 2d 18 - State v. Goebel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The common plan or scheme exception, however, refers to a larger criminal design of which the charged crime is only one part. State v. Bowen, 48 Wn. App. 187, 192 , 738 P.2d 316 (1987). The scope of the common plan exception is limited to evidence showing a causal connection between the other crime or act and the charged crime, so that proof of the other offense could be said to evidence a pre-existing design, system, plan, or scheme directed toward the doing of the very act charged. Bowen, 48 Wn. App. at 192 (quoting State v. Goebel, 40 Wn.2d 18, 21 , 240 P.2d 251 (1952)); see also State v. Harris, 36 Wn. App. 746, 751 , 677 P.2d 202 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.