58 Wis. 2d 21 - State v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 1978
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 51 Wis. 2d 659 - State v. Becker · 43 Wis. 2d 488 - Deja v. State · 49 Wis. 2d 350 - State v. Heidelbach · 46 Wis. 2d 164 - State v. Moffett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Cross-examination. Error is alleged in the trial court’s restricting cross-examination of certain state witnesses. Four instances are set forth where the prosecutor objected to a question asked and the trial court sustained the objection. In each instance the defense counsel made no response to the objection, and no offer of proof was made in regard to any testimony thus excluded. An offer of proof is a condition precedent to having this court review an allegedly erroneous ruling on evidence, and here none was made. (See: Deja v. State (1969), 43 Wis. 2d 488, 492 , 168 N. W. 2d 856 ; State v. Moffett (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 164, 168 , 174 N. W. 2d 263 ; State v. Becker (1971), 51 Wis. 2d 659, 668 , 188 N. W. 2d 449 .)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.