Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 580 A2D 145 - State v. Shortsleeves

State v. Shortsleeves’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably United States v. Lombard (1995), State v. Ardolino (1997)

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

1201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · State v. Black · State v. Huff · State v. Hallowell · State v. Linscott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 2154. Purposes of sentence review by Supreme Judicial Court The general objectives of sentence review by the Supreme Judicial Court are: 1. Sentence correction. To correct a sentence which is excessive in length, having regard to the nature of the offense, the character of the offender and the protection of the public interest; 2. Promote respect for law. To promote respect for law by correcting abuses of sentencing power and by increasing the fairness of the sentencing process; 3. Rehabilitation. To facilitate the possible rehabilitation of an offender by reducing manifest and unwarranted inequalities among the sentences of comparable offenders; and 4. Sentencing criteria. To promote the development and application of criteria for sentencing which are both rational and just.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In 1977, the six degrees of criminal homicide were eliminated and the crimes were recategorized as murder, felony murder, manslaughter and aiding or soliciting suicide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Multiple deaths, including situations in which the offender in committing the murder knowingly created a substantial risk of death to several individuals”; (3)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.