Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 580 F.2d 112 - Hailey v. Dorsey

Hailey v. Dorsey’s Empirical Analysis

580 F.2d 112 · 1978

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2002

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Stone v. Powell · Hill v. United States · Davis v. United States · Colten v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Original jurisdiction over juvenile offenders is vested exclusively in the juvenile and domestic relations court, except those cases in which the offender has been transferred to the circuit court for criminal proceedings .... Thus, if there be a significant defect in the transfer proceeding, the circuit court never gains jurisdiction over the juvenile and therefore has no authority to impose a sentence on the offender .... the jurisdiction of the circuit court may depend upon actions by the juvenile court, and, if the juvenile court fails to take a fundamental action required by the statutes, the circuit court never gains jurisdiction over the juvenile offender, or at least loses its authority to proceed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “exceptional circumstances where the need for the remedy afforded by the writ of habeas corpus is apparent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.