Cordero v. Triple Machine Shop’s Empirical Analysis
580 F.2d 1331 · 1978
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Bumble Bee Seafoods v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (1980), Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Black (1983)
52 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 908 · 33 U.S.C. § 944
Relies on Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois · Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co. · Hicks v. Miranda · O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc. · Cardillo US v. Liberty Mut Ins Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all employers will be the last employer a proportionate share of the time.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where the ALJ relies on witness credibility in reaching his decision, our court will interfere only where the credibility determinations conflict with the clear preponderance of the evidence[,] or where the determinations are inherently incredible or patently unreasonable.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mulade Sam Carson v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs L.A. Container Terminals Industrial Indemnity · Ruth Grijalva v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs National Steel & Shipbuilding Co., National Steel & Shipbulding Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Ruth Grijalva“The reviewing court's function is exhausted when it appears that there is warrant in the evidence and a 'reasonable legal basis' for the Board's award.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.