Barnett v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
580 F.2d 28 · 1978
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 1991 · most notably Ellis v. Blum (1981), City of New York v. Heckler (1984)
27 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Goldberg v. Kelly · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · White v. Mathews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) The claimant or his representative causes a delay by his failure to provide information essential for adjudication; (b) the claimant or his representative requests) a delay; (c) the claimant or his representative fails to appear for a scheduled hearing; (d) other action or omission directly attributable to the claimant or his representative.” See p. 30.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Secretary shall provide reasonable notice and opportunity for a hearing,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The final determination of the Secretary after a hearing under paragraph (1) shall be subject to judicial review as provided in section 405(g) of this title to the same extent as the Secretary’s final determinations under section 405 of this title; except that the determination of the Secretary after such hearing as to any fact shall be final and conclusive and not subject to review by any court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.