Montgomery v. Wyeth’s Empirical Analysis
580 F.3d 455 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson · Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc. · Hoffman v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Teeters v. Currey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) the needs of the interstate and international systems, (b) the relevant policies of the forum, (c) the relevant policies of other interested states and the relative interests of those states in the determination of the particular issue, (d) the protection of justified expectations, (e) the basic policies underlying the particular field of law, (f) certainty, predictability, and uniformity of result, and (g) ease in the determination and application of the law to be applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) the place where the injury occurred, (b) the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred, (c) the domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties, (d) the place where the relationship, if any, between the parties is centered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because this is a diversity action, the law of the forum State, including the choice-of-law rules, apply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.