Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 580 F.3d 55 - DeCaro v. Hasbro, Inc.

DeCaro v. Hasbro, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

580 F.3d 55 · 2009

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Jones v. Nationwide Life Insurance (2012), United States v. Sasso (2012)

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

390200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp. · United States v. Slade · Sandstrom v. Chemlawn Corp. · Faigin v. Kelly · Russell v. Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ontentions not advanced in an appellant's opening brief are deemed waived.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Questions as to whether jury instructions capture the essence of the applicable law are reviewed de novo, while questions as to whether the court's choice of phraseology in crafting its jury instructions is unfairly prejudicial are reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “why his prior SSDI statements were consistent with his claim that he could perform the essential functions of his job with reasonable accommodations. Id. at 47 . Like here, the plaintiff, in his deposition testimony, had”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.