Cuddy v. Carmen’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Lehman v. Nakshian · Loeb v. Textron, Inc. · Coburn v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. · Spagnuolo v. Whirlpool Corp. · Smithers v. Bailar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Schoenfelder returned the original Certificate to CSC on May 20, 1975 (retaining a copy for 'possible later reactivation'), that the selection panel met on May 20 to consider federal applicants, and that the selection of a federal applicant was made on June 5, 1975.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cuddy v. Carmen“an error may have occurred in the selection process, but there is nothing to show that it rises to the level of discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cuddy v. Carmen“the evidence indicate[d] that it [was] quite possible that plaintiff's name was never referred to Treichel for consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cuddy v. Carmen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.