Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lewis v. State · Chandler v. State · 179 Ind. App. 143 - McFarland v. State · Washington v. State · Day v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The reviewing court will not revise a sentence authorized by statute except where such sentence is manifestly unreasonable in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender. (2) A sentence is not manifestly unreasonable unless no reasonable person could find such sentence appropriate to the particular offense and offender for wMch such sentence was imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lewis v. State · Ross v. State“an accused must be aware of the probable consequences of his act, but ... not every misapprehension concerning the extent and nature of the criminal liability to which a confession may expose the accused vitiates the voluntariness of the confession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tingle v. State“[tlhe trial court was well within its discretion to find this factor standing alone insufficient to render the confession involuntary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tingle v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.