Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 580 P2D 1090 - Kessimakis v. Kessimakis

Kessimakis v. Kessimakis’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 19 Utah 2d 358 - Riter v. Cayias · Foreman v. Foreman · Brown v. Cook · Gale v. Gale · Harris v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court is clearly committed to the proposition that in order to modify a prior decree the moving party must show a substantial change of circumstances. In the absence of such a showing, the decree shall not be modified and the matters previously litigated and incorporated therein cannot be collaterally attacked in face of the doctrine of res judicata.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.