Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2016
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Russell · Hampton v. United States · Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Porter v. States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"There is no indication in the record that the appellant was intoxicated to the extent that he could not comprehend the meaning of his words. Therefore, the appellant's drug use was a circumstance to be considered by the jury, rather than a factor which would affect the admissibility of his statement."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[i]t should be borne in mind that under our system of pleading, indictments are rather a statement of legal conclusions, than of facts.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vaughn v. State“`[I]t is not required that an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vaughn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.