Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

580 So. 2d 348

Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-06-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1992

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-06-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We grant the appellant belated appeal on the ground that the trial court’s order denying his rule 3.850 motion did not apprise him of the thirty-day period in which appeal must be filed. The order is affirmed as to *349appellant’s grounds three and four alleged in his motion for post-conviction relief, and reversed and remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on grounds one and two, or for attachment to the order of denial of portions of the record that conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief.

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

LETTS, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
/580/so2d/348 · .json · Public domain