Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

580 So. 2d 349

Henry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-06-12

Relies on 545 So. 2d 838 - Lambert v. State

Decided 1991-06-12

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s finding that appellant violated his probation. However, we reverse and remand for resentencing as the sentences imposed on Counts I and X exceed the permitted “one cell bump up.” Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989). As conceded by the State, upon remand the written sentences as to Counts VI and XIII shall be corrected to reflect that concurrent fifteen year jail sentences were imposed without any period of probation.

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR RESEN-TENCING.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
/580/so2d/349 · .json · Public domain