Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

580 So. 2d 614

Docket No. 77241.

State v. Gillette

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James Howard GILLETTE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 13, 1991.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1991-06-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1991

1 state decisions

Relies on 577 So. 2d 939 - State v. McCloud · State v. VAA · Luizza v. Yaeger

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Wendy Buffington and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.

¶2Dwight M. Wells, Tampa, for respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We granted review of Gillette v. State,571 So.2d 600, 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), to answer the following certified question of great public importance:

When a double jeopardy violation is alleged based on the crimes of sale and possession (or possession with intent to sell) of the same quantum of contraband and the crimes occurred after the effective date of section 775.021, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), is it improper to convict and sentence for both crimes?

¶5We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. We answered this question in the negative in State v. McCloud,577 So.2d 939 (Fla. 1991), and State v. V.A.A.,577 So.2d 941 (Fla. 1991). Therefore, we quash the opinion under review with instructions to affirm the conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine.

¶6It is so ordered.

¶7SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

/580/so2d/614 · .json · Public domain