Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 580 SW2D 249 - McDermott v. Nations

McDermott v. Nations’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2000

2 state decisions

101979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sawyer v. Barbour · Anthony v. Morrow · Hynes v. Risch · State v. Rumfelt · State ex rel. Howell County v. West Plains Telephone Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The meaning of a term must be determined from the context in which it is used and from the intention of its draftsmen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.