Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 580 SW2D 815 - Plunkett v. State

Plunkett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 1998 · most notably Cockrell v. State (1996), Green v. State (1984)

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

400197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cumbie v. State · Flores v. State · Robinson v. State · Stogsdill v. State · Easley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person commits an offense if he: (1) intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual; (2) intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so prejudicial that no instruction could cure the harm,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Our law provides that a person commits murder if he intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual, or intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual. Now if you believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, Lee Andrew Moring, did intentionally or knowingly in Walker County, Texas, on or about the 7th day of July 1977, cause the death of Matthew O’Bryant by shooting him with a pistol, or that the defendant did then and there intend to cause serious bodily injury to the said Matthew O’Bryant and with said intent to cause such injury did commit an act clearly dangerous to human life, to wit: shooting the said Matthew O’Bryant with a pistol and causing the death of the said Matthew O’Bryant, then you will find the defendant guilty of murder.” (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.