Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 581 A.2d 415 - State v. Cook

State v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Brooks v. Tennessee · United States v. Barber · State v. Dechaine · State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decision whether to impose a sanction on the State for failure to comply with Rule 16(b) is a matter for the trial court and will not be overturned absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. “To establish an abuse of discretion, [the defendant] must show that he was, in fact, prejudiced by [a] Rule 16(b) violation and that the prejudice rose to the level of depriving him of a fair trial,” ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.