Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

581 A.2d 788

In re Melton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1990

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1990-11-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1991

2 state decisions

Relies on In Re Melton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, the motion to file transcript relevant to the petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court, has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

¶3ORDERED that the motion to file transcript relevant to the petition for rehearing en banc is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged transcript. It is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 6, 1989, 565 A.2d 635, are hereby vacated. It is

¶5FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before November 19, 1990.

/581/a2d/788 · .json · Public domain