United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
581 F.2d 341 · 1978
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 6 district · 37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 150 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd (1983), United States v. Renville (1985)
62 federal appellate · 6 district · 37 state decisions — followed in 18 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · California v. Green · Dutton v. Evans · Brookhart v. Janis · Texas v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the circumstances in which [the declarant] made the statement and the incentive he had to speak truthfully or falsely.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.