Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 581 F.2d 455 - Goolsby v. Blumenthal

Goolsby v. Blumenthal’s Empirical Analysis

581 F.2d 455 · 1978

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2019

1 federal appellate ·

4019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations · Silver v. New York Stock Exchange · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Investment Company Institute v. Camp · Poe v. Seaborn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““post-passage remarks of legislators, however explicit, cannot serve to change the legislative intent of Congress expressed before the Act’s passage ... Such statements ‘represent only the personal views of these legislators, since the statements were [made] after passage of Act.’ ” Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases, 419 U.S. 102, 132 [ 95 S.Ct. 335, 353 , 42 L.Ed.2d 320 ] (1974).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)he head of a Federal agency shall not approve any grant . . . unless he receives satisfactory assurances from such State agency that (the URA will be followed).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Where the two statutes in question are capable of standing together, there is no irreconcilable conflict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.