Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 581 F.3d 575 - McGowan v. Deere & Co.

McGowan v. Deere & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

581 F.3d 575 · 2009

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020 · most notably Montgomery v. American Airlines, Inc. (2010), Davis v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, L.P. (2011)

9 federal appellate ·

350200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Radue v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. · Johnson v. City of Fort Wayne · Buie v. Quad/Graphics, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a plaintiff lacks direct evidence [that the employer’s stated reason for an employment action is dishonest and that the true reason was based on discriminatory intent], [s]he may use indirect evidence and must show that the stated reason is not credible and is factually baseless, and [s]he ultimately must be able to point to some circumstances from which an inference can be drawn that the real reason for the employment action was discriminatory.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.