Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 581 NE2D 978 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2012

10 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stewart v. State · Lewis v. State · St. John v. State · Douglas v. State · Ulrich v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Herring was to testify as to a prior inconsistent statement given by the victim. The State objected and made a motion in limine to prevent Herring from testifying to any prior inconsistent statements made by the victim. The State claimed that defense had failed to lay a proper foundation for these statements by failing to cross-examine the victim first as to the prior inconsistent statements. The trial court granted the motion in limine and stated that the testimony would have been permitted if defense had laid a proper foundation.[ 45 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Horton
  2. “Due to the fact that the victim's credibility was the major factor in the case, it was crucial for the defense to admit any evidence that would have questioned her credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Wesley v. State
  3. “'in my opinion the child is telling the truth,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fleener v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.