Mills v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 375 So. 2d 1257 - Williams v. State · Orr v. State · 360 So. 2d 358 - Waters v. State · Buckles v. State · 415 So. 2d 1249 - Hollins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The appellant alleges that because the evidence tended to show that he actually participated in the burglary and theft, his conviction for receiving stolen property was contrary to the law. Where the evidence is undisputed that the appellant committed the theft, he cannot be convicted of receiving the same stolen property from that theft. Ex parte Thomas , 445 So.2d 939 (Ala. 1983)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.