581 So. 2d 1202 - Hull v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “photographic spread containing a black and white photograph of the defendant and color photographs of four other subjects was 'impermissibly suggestive' "). "The fact, in and of itself, that there was some slight discrepancy in the physical appearance among the participants of a lineup does not taint that identification procedure or render it suggestive as a matter of law.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Leitner v. State · 607 So. 2d 369 - Hull v. State

2. “had an independent basis of reliability.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Jackson v. State · Leitner v. State

3. “"[W]hether eyewitness identification evidence which ensues from a pre-trial identification procedure is constitutionally infirm requires a two-step inquiry. First, it must be determined whether the pre-trial identification procedures were unduly suggestive. . . . If so, the suggestiveness of the identification procedures must be balanced against factors indicating that the in-court identification was independently reliable."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Powell v. State