Hayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Larzelere v. State (1996), 782 So. 2d 343 - Muhammad v. State (2001)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Simmons v. United States · Proffitt v. Florida · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) A statement is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement and the statement is: [[Image here]] (e) One of identification of a person made after perceiving the person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.