Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 581 SO2D 553 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Cortez · Alabama v. White · Steagald v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"After the jurors have retired to consider their verdict, if they request to have any testimony repeated, or if they or any party requests additional instructions, the court may recall the jurors to the courtroom and order the testimony read or give appropriate additional instructions. The court may also order other testimony read or give other instructions, so as not to give undue prominence to the particular testimony or instructions requested. Such testimony may be read or such instruction given only after notice to the parties."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This rule is permissive, rather than mandatory as evidenced by the use of the word 'may.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.