Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 581 So. 2d 641 - State v. Miller

581 So. 2d 641 - State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2011

10 state decisions

60199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 524 So. 2d 1146 - Fleming v. State · 183 So. 2d 25 - Friday v. Newman · 558 So. 2d 192 - Fairway Industries, Inc. v. Shuemaker · 281 So. 2d 41 - Walker v. State · Mishan v. Crews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(5) A prosecution is commenced when either an indictment or information is filed, provided the capias, summons, or other process issued on such indictment or information is executed without un reasonable delay. In determining what is reasonable, inability to locate the defendant after diligent search or the defendant’s absence from the state shall be considered.... (6) The period of limitation does not run during any time when the defendant is continuously absent from the state or has no reasonable ascertainable place of abode or work within the state, but in no case shall this provision extend the period of limitation otherwise applicable by more than 3 years.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the mere filing of an information does not commence a prosecution. A prosecution is not commenced by filing an information unless a capias is issued and executed without unreasonable delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the absence from the state is not the fault of the defendant and does not result in preventing prosecution, the time periods of statutes of limitations are not tolled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.