State v. Helt’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1981
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Neil v. Biggers · Wardius v. Oregon · State v. Taylor · State v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To raise and preserve a federal or state constitutional question for appellate review the question must (1) be raised at the first available opportunity, (2) the section or sections of the Constitution claimed to be violated must be specified, (3) the question must be kept alive at every stage of the proceeding, (4) the question must be presented in a motion for new trial and (5) it must be adequately covered in the briefs filed in the appellate tribunal, [authorities omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thurber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.