Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 581 SW2D 661 - Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2009 · most notably Sharp v. State (1986), Harris v. State (1989)

33 state decisions

2501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. State · Laws v. State · Fite v. State · Sledge v. State · 106 Tex. Crim. 478 - Briscoe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““You are further instructed that you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the accuracy of the identification of the Defendant as the perpetrator of the offense charged, and you are instructed that if from all the facts and circumstances in evidence you have a reasonable doubt as to whether the Defendant is the person who committed the offense alleged in the indictment, if committed, you will find the Defendant not guilty and so say by your verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““You are instructed that the State has the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant, Teresa Freeman Wortham, is the party who committed the offense as alleged in the indictment, and unless they have so proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should acquit the Defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.