Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 582 F.2d 1138 - Ringquist v. Hampton

Ringquist v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

582 F.2d 1138 · 1978

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2019

5 federal appellate ·

4019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Morrissey v. Brewer · Alderman v. United States · Arnett v. Kennedy · Scalza v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is flexible and requires only 'such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.