Drivers Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers Teamsters Local Union No v. Akers Motor Lines Inc Drivers Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers Teamsters Local Union’s Empirical Analysis
582 F.2d 1336 · 1978
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Independent Oil and Chemical Workers of Quincy Inc v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company (1988), Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Bradley (1985)
16 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 · Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers · Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson · National Association of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio v. Sombrotto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“could not return the parties substantially to the status quo ante.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[A] plaintiff, without regard to whether he is the employer or the union, seeking to maintain the status quo pending arbitration pursuant to the principles of Boys Markets need only establish that the position he will espouse in arbitration is suffi ciently sound to prevent the arbitration from being a futile endeavor. If there is a genuine dispute with respect to an arbitrable issue, the barrier [to the issuance of an injunction] we believe appropriate[ly sic] has been cleared.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the arbitrator could subsequently alter pay schedules or revise the work schedules depending on whether he found for the union or the company and return the parties to substantially the status quo ante.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.