Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 582 F.2d 898 - United States v. Beechum

United States v. Beechum’s Empirical Analysis

582 F.2d 898 · 1978

Citation profile

1,302
cited by 1,302 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

913 federal appellate · 15 district · 109 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,302 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Huddleston v. United States (1988), Dowling v. United States (1990)

913 federal appellate · 15 district · 109 state decisions — followed in 34 states

5520197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1708

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Griffin v. California · Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Nixon

Cited together with Santoni v. United States · Glasser v. United States · Huddleston v. United States · Bell v. United States · Jackson v. Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,302 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
    250 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'Mr. Beechum gave no explanation for his possession of the silver dollars. In fact, he told (the inspector), "you have all the answers, and I don't have any for you.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unless its probative value is `substantially outweighed by its undue prejudice,'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.