United States v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis
582 F.3d 781 · 2009
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Icaza · United States v. Radziszewski · United States of America v. Wheeler · United States v. Hill · United States v. Watts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it [was] not immediately apparent how [the] harms translate[d] to the monetary harm clearly required under § 2B1.1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any person who sustained any part of the actual loss determined under subsection (b)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the individuals suffered pecuniary harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.