Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

582 F. App'x 151

Hemphill v. Aramark Corp.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 20, 2014

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2014-08-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2016

1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-08-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Eric Hemphill appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hemphill v. Aramark Corp., No. 1:12-ev-01584-ELH, 2014 WL 1248296 (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2014; entered Mar. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/582/fappx/151 · .json · Public domain