Daniel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Spranger v. State (1995), Edgecomb v. State (1996)
2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Kent v. United States · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Hayes v. Florida · Octopi, Inc. v. Courtney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Instruction No. 6 To convict the defendant of the erime of Murder as charged in Count I of the information in this case, the State must prove each of the following elements: That the defendant 1. knowingly or intentionally 2. either (a) himself killed, or (b) aided, induced, or caused another person to kill 3. Etta Alexander.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buie v. State“Under the law of this state, you must presume that the defendant is innocent. You must continue to believe she is innocent throughout the trial unless the State proves that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of every essential element of the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edgecomb v. State“the viciousness of appellant's attack, the lack of any justification for it, the seriousness of its results, and the relatively mature age, 17, of the juvenile involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.