Rigsby v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2016
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reinbold v. State · Everroad v. State · Jarver v. State · Shinn v. State · Perkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person who knowingly or intentionally takes property from another person or from the presence of another person: (1) by using or threatening the use of force on any person; or (2) by putting any person in fear; commits robbery, a Class C felony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“While 'putting in fear' is not defined by statute, case law reflects that a fear of bodily injury or personal harm is required to support a conviction requiring a person be put in 'fear'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.